Silvi | Citations

Silvi used in Research

Researchers have used Silvi® to conduct peer-reviewed literature reviews in many scientific disciplines.

All

Narrative review

Realist Review

Meta Analysis

Scoping Review

Umbrella Review

Systematic Literature Review

Meta Analysis

Ongoing

Incidence of venous thromboembolism in autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases – a living systematic review and meta-analysis

Husum et al.

2026

Systematic Literature Review

Ongoing

"Going Greener" – what hinders and what helps the implementation of a more sustainable clinical consumption in hospitals? A systematic literature review.

Gaden et al.

2026

Realist Review

Ongoing

Optimising person-centered rehabilitation programmes for older adults with disability across health care systems: A realist review and synthesis

Jespersen et al.

2026

Umbrella Review

Ongoing

Effectiveness of Interventions for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Multimorbidity: An Umbrella review of Systematic Reviews

Guldager et al.

2026

Meta Analysis

Ongoing

Effect of Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, LGG® (DSM33156) on the defence against pathogens in the upper respiratory tract in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jensen et al.

2026

Meta Analysis

Ongoing

Association between acetabular cup anteversion measured on plain radiographs and clinical outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Baruah et al.

2026

Scoping Review

Mapping of primary care interventions targeting community-dwelling older adults with chronic multimorbidity: a scoping review

Jessen-Winge et al.

2026

Journal of Public Health

Systematic Literature Review

Information Security Behavior in Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review

Bwiino et al.

2025

Journal of Information Security and Cybercrimes Research

Systematic Literature Review

Exploring Childhood Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) and the Microbiome—A Systematic Review

Van den Ende et al.

2025

Life 15, 730

Systematic Literature Review

A systematic review of the Novosorb® Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix in the treatment of complex wounds

Fruergaard et al.

2025

Burns Open, Vol 9

Systematic Literature Review

Potential clinical applications of current and future oral forms of desmopressin (Review)

Everaert et al.

2024

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, Vol 28 Issue 2

Narrative review

Lifelong LUTS: Understanding the bladder's role and implications across transition phases, a comprehensive review

Kheir et al.

2024

Neurourology Urodynamics, Vol 43 Issue 5

What researchers say

Silvi provides a collaborative and flexible environment, where you can host your literature review. Plus, their team has always supported us immediately in our special requests
Isabela Maranca
PhD Student
,
DTU
When you’re doing a review for the first time, there’s a lot to keep track of, and having everything in one platform that helped me stay organised was a huge help.
Maria Gaden
Udviklingschef
,
Copenhagen University
Being able to go straight back to the relevant passage in the article and see exactly which text the extracted data is based on is a major advantage. It makes the process both transparent and easy to verify.
Julie Dalgaard
Docent
,
UC Syd
I have now used Silvi in two review projects and expect to use it again in future reviews. The possibility to organise and tag studies throughout the review process, revisit them later, and generate both quantitative overviews and preliminary thematic insights made the work more efficient and transparent.
Mille Nabsen Marwaa
Lector
,
UC Syd
Silvi highlights data directly in PDFs, which makes its origin clear. This transparency helps me read faster while staying critical of the extracted data.
Charlotte Arnou
PhD student
,
KU Leuven
Silvi AI has been a pleasure to use. My favourite feature is the AI extracted highlighted text which provides enhanced rigour and transparency.
Charlene Vermaak
PhD Student
,
Wits University

Silvi provides a collaborative and flexible environment, where you can host your literature review. Plus, their team has always supported us immediately in our special requests
Isabela Maranca
PhD Student
,
DTU
When you’re doing a review for the first time, there’s a lot to keep track of, and having everything in one platform that helped me stay organised was a huge help.
Maria Gaden
Udviklingschef
,
Copenhagen University
Being able to go straight back to the relevant passage in the article and see exactly which text the extracted data is based on is a major advantage. It makes the process both transparent and easy to verify.
Julie Dalgaard
Docent
,
UC Syd
I have now used Silvi in two review projects and expect to use it again in future reviews. The possibility to organise and tag studies throughout the review process, revisit them later, and generate both quantitative overviews and preliminary thematic insights made the work more efficient and transparent.
Mille Nabsen Marwaa
Lector
,
UC Syd
Silvi highlights data directly in PDFs, which makes its origin clear. This transparency helps me read faster while staying critical of the extracted data.
Charlotte Arnou
PhD student
,
KU Leuven
Silvi AI has been a pleasure to use. My favourite feature is the AI extracted highlighted text which provides enhanced rigour and transparency.
Charlene Vermaak
PhD Student
,
Wits University

Silvi provides a collaborative and flexible environment, where you can host your literature review. Plus, their team has always supported us immediately in our special requests
Isabela Maranca
PhD Student
,
DTU
When you’re doing a review for the first time, there’s a lot to keep track of, and having everything in one platform that helped me stay organised was a huge help.
Maria Gaden
Udviklingschef
,
Copenhagen University
Being able to go straight back to the relevant passage in the article and see exactly which text the extracted data is based on is a major advantage. It makes the process both transparent and easy to verify.
Julie Dalgaard
Docent
,
UC Syd
I have now used Silvi in two review projects and expect to use it again in future reviews. The possibility to organise and tag studies throughout the review process, revisit them later, and generate both quantitative overviews and preliminary thematic insights made the work more efficient and transparent.
Mille Nabsen Marwaa
Lector
,
UC Syd
Silvi highlights data directly in PDFs, which makes its origin clear. This transparency helps me read faster while staying critical of the extracted data.
Charlotte Arnou
PhD student
,
KU Leuven
Silvi AI has been a pleasure to use. My favourite feature is the AI extracted highlighted text which provides enhanced rigour and transparency.
Charlene Vermaak
PhD Student
,
Wits University